It has many benefits, including: Reactive Programming can be used in a wide variety of systems and applications, including real-time systems, asynchronous systems, event-driven systems, and more. But nowadays all important companies respect and follow the reactive manifesto http://www.reactivemanifesto.org/, If you want to see some practical examples you can reference here https://github.com/politrons/reactive. This change propagation could be achieved in a number of ways, where perhaps the most natural way is an invalidate/lazy-revalidate scheme. ObserveOn: specify the Scheduler on which an observer will observe this Observable. For instance, callbacks can be installed in the getters of the object-oriented library to notify the reactive update engine about state changes, and changes in the reactive component can be pushed to the object-oriented library through getters. Engineer business systems that scale to millions of operations with millisecond response times, Enable Enabling scale and performance for the data-driven enterprise, Unlock the value of your data assets with Machine Learning and AI, Enterprise Transformational Change with Cloud Engineering platform, Creating and implementing architecture strategies that produce outstanding business value, Over a decade of successful software deliveries, we have built products, platforms, and templates that allow us to do rapid development. Ill have to investigate. This might be due to poor marketing materials you got your hands on or a misconception you heard somewhere, but I would say that your portrayal of Rx is fairly inaccurate. CPython has a GIL so unless you go to an alternative implementation (Jython/IPython) or message passing/multiple interpreters route you cant really build multi core solutions. The further claim is that the immediate goody coming from that idea is that Observable can be seen as a place from where events are flying to observers. @Jarle, my post is focused on MSFT and MVPs way of selling RxJS and selling C# with Rx. Web3.2Implementation challenges in reactive programming 3.2.1Glitches 3.2.2Cyclic dependencies 3.2.3Interaction with mutable state 3.2.4Dynamic updating of the graph of How are we doing? An event stream is steered either by the handlers themselves where work is dispatched to a specific next process, or by a message bus such as an enterprise service bus or message queue that carries the message to designated bus listeners. You can see some practical examples of reactive programming here: https://github.com/politrons/reactive, And about back pressure here: https://github.com/politrons/Akka/blob/master/src/main/scala/stream/BackPressure.scala. Side Note: Funny, there is it seems, a curious lack of MVP endorsed F# Rx texts ? Here is one explanation from one of them clever blogger ones: The premise of Reactive Programming is the Observer pattern. What is childish on my side is to speak of M$FT as one single entity. In general, the more restricted a language is, the more its associated compilers and analysis tools are able to inform developers (e.g., in performing analysis for whether programs are able to execute in actual real time). This involves a subject and an observer Used to aims to make it easier to write code that reacts to changes in data. While the Observer pattern is involved with the raising and listening of events, Rx is much more than this. Show us the code, now! @filthy_wizard It as I mentioned might be difficult initially to wrap around your head, but these operators simplify and reduce the amount of code for a lot of things you would otherwise have to do yourself. Thank You, thank You ! Might feel unconventional to learn at start(needs everything to be a stream). Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. But in which language, in order to prove the point? Second, it provides excellent abstractions, that enable concurrency to become declarative. But, now say you want your submit button to be enabled only when fields have a valid input. Topological sorting of dependencies depends on the dependency graph being a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Its here and now. Microsoft Developers relations department has new paradigm to sell. JavaScript : function call arguments as expressions. Process asynchronously to avoid coordination and waiting. Functional trade-offs in specificity may result in deterioration of the general applicability of a language. This approach is especially important when nodes hold large amounts of state data, which would otherwise be expensive to recompute from scratch. Rx has great value for C# programmers because it hides the complexity of using C# in: asynchronous, observer/observable, and similar scenarios. If an OORP language maintains its imperative methods, it would also fall under the category of imperative reactive programming. Reactive programming deals with data flow and automatically propagates changes via the data flow. *From Jesses blog. Normally it is used in situations where your publisher emits more information than your consumer can process. No observers. as in example? Am I being scammed after paying almost $10,000 to a tree company not being able to withdraw my profit without paying a fee. This allows an update mechanism to choose different orders in which to perform updates, and leave the specific order unspecified (thereby enabling optimizations). Not only does this facilitate event-based reactions, but it makes reactive programs instrumental to the correctness of software. Moreover. But streams generated by software-inserted observers are a bit more complicated. Well, it simply can and it simply is. Not what you have expected? That is, the resulting value out of a data flow is another data flow graph that is executed using the same evaluation model as the first. To re-turn to feasibility each enterprise has to innovate, Enterprise Architecture For Country Governance, Reactive Programming is a Push model rather than an ask for model, Reactive Programming follows the Observer Pattern, Reactive Programming shows its true value with asynchronous event handling. * this is done using standard .NET collection/IEnumerable manipulation syntax hence the duality and push/pull collections. It is a style of software development. Everybody around her cubicle, got very excited. Assert autonomy. But why asking C# developer to write a JavaScript library, in the first place? Yesterday (somehow) I stumbled upon Jesse Libertys article (mainly on Windows Phone 7 + Silverlight) where he got very hot and excited on something that is called Reactive Programming. Early applications of reactive programming to business applications were largely confined to things such as monitoring the state of networks, servers or software, and signaling database conditions such as inventory levels. In such cases, the node's previous output is then ignored. You may refer my multi part blog post part one, part two and part three for further details. What *is* useful is the way that you can compose Observables and schedule them to be executed in different ways. And yes, you guessed it, it is very easy to use Jesse says, especially from C#, because C# has all this brilliant features, like lambdas. Suppose seconds is a reactive value that changes every second to represent the current time (in seconds). When it comes to code, readability and simplicity are the uttermost important properties. Thanks for persevering through my rant. I do not know about you, but I have never seen anything like this: What also annoys me to no end, is that now we have the .NET C# brigade telling us how to do things properly in JavaScript. Here differentiated reactive programming could potentially be used to give the spell checker lower priority, allowing it to be delayed while keeping other data-flows instantaneous. Unfortunately, this can depend on the order of evaluation. 3 point to walk away with : talk to Jesse (and others) about that. Events are information they are called with. Thanks. A language might offer a notion of "mutable cell". So what? incremental change propagation. It is not his fault and name is irrelevant, and he already left Microsoft anyway. The result is that we can enjoy pearls of wisdom and enlightened discoveries, form hundreds of blogs.msdn.com pages like this pearl for example: As we should know, the model of the web is largely asynchronous in that we shouldnt block for potentially long running operations. Jordan's line about intimate parties in The Great Gatsby? For the time being I think RxJS is firmly in the category if you can do it that does not mean you should do it, at least for me. I feel exactly the same way. Instead it might be necessary to give different parts of the data flow graph different evaluation priorities. Reactive programming have advantages when you work with asynchronous data streams. Reactive programming has principal similarities with the observer pattern commonly used in object-oriented programming. This is essentially FP approach (IEnumerable/IObservable is a monad after all), the re-branding is done since they cater to the SQL/OO devs but its still the same thing integrated in to the rest of the framework. This facilitates an addressing of the callback's. Our Sometimes the term reactive programming refers to the architectural level of software engineering, where individual nodes in the data flow graph are ordinary programs that communicate with each other. The reactive manifesto argues for a reactive software design and has been signed thousands of times. Reactive Programming is a paradigm that helps developers write event-driven applications by using observable streams of data. IO scheduler as the name suggests is best suited for IO intensive tasks such as network calls etc. Yes, 90% of it at least. There are two principal ways employed in the building of a dependency graph: When propagating changes, it is possible to pick propagation orders such that the value of an expression is not a natural consequence of the source program. Here is one of those videos: http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/Expert-to-Expert-Brian-Beckman-and-Erik-Meijer-Inside-the-NET-Reactive-Framework-Rx/, If you want to see a pretty good demo of some of the composability and behavior you can do in Rx, I would highly recommend this video by Bart de Smet: Reactive Programming is not easy, and it definitely comes with a steep learning curve, as you will have to un-wrap your head from imperative programming and Finally a word on subscribeOn and observeOn. If you were educated or entertained by this site, please click here. In other words, there is no thread blocking in asynchronous processing, yet data is processed in portions. Perspectives from Knolders around the globe, Knolders sharing insights on a bigger C# to JavaScript straight. It might very well be eye-opening. I always preferred more lines of code. If you are working in a REPL or command-line environment, and you have to type a command every time you want to obtain a result, your system is not reactive. it), Event-driven inspired -> plays well with streams (Kafka, But again, no means to create own communication tools were provided to asynchronous programmer. And this is where my annoyance starts. 542), We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. Easier to scale (pipe any operation). These events are best visualized as "streams" that can flow through multiple processing elements, be stopped and handled along the way, or fork and generate parallel processing activity. the right business decisions. In a way which renders C# almost laughable. The most common is that this type of code is difficult to debug. Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! As shown in the example above. Thats it !? Cleaner code, more concise. Which are in the DOM , since the day one of the DOM. What does a search warrant actually look like? Reactive programming is about building those observers and handlers and threading the stream as required. In this programming, an Observable is a data source and an Observer is the consumer of the data. Different flavors though. How are you differentiating between Reactive Programming and Functional Reactive Programming? But, hey wait a minute pardner ! The Observable emits items to its Observers which can be added and removed dynamically during runtime. Typically, languages provide an operator like delay that is used by the update mechanism for this purpose, since a delay implies that what follows must be evaluated in the "next time step" (allowing the current evaluation to terminate). To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. [citation needed] This could potentially make reactive programming highly memory consuming. This is a powerful tool that has the potential to change how we build software. Where did I say MSFT said they invented these technologies ? How is "He who Remains" different from "Kang the Conqueror"? (You can remove this and my previous comment.). Rx is built for solving composition problems in async message/event handling. Where an event stream must trigger a real-world response, such as opening a gate, keep the control loop short by moving the responding process closer to the front of the stream and hosting it near the event source. In other words : RX does bring good things to the table , but please M$FT stay at your table :). So having this mechanism you can control the flow of traffic between both and avoid the nasty out of memory problems. With a little help of a function object, of course. In Fortune 100 ones? ", // Darn! Reactive architectures are becoming increasingly popular for organizations that need to do more, with less hardware. I warned you: it is simple when not thinking C#. With one line, I can attach to my search buttons Key Up event and handle it after the user has stopped typing for half a second. Brilliant I could care less what you said about Reactive programming, but I love the way you talk about the C# programmers (who are the modern-day version of Apple users with their arrogance and were better than everyone else crap). 1999. Architecture of Windows 10. When this software element recognizes a condition, it generates an event in the stream. For example, the observer pattern commonly describes data-flows between whole objects/classes, whereas object-oriented reactive programming could target the members of objects/classes. But why digging for such a necessary information which should be part of each and every general text on Reactive Programming? The guests are those MS Research members I mentioned before. But regardless of that it is skilfully (re)packaged and made into the .NET panacea in 2010, for good little developers, slurping it up from evangelists and uber-developers. production, Monitoring and alerting for complex systems is there a chinese version of ex. Reactive Programming Advantages/Disadvantages. And this is the core of this article: My objection to misleading obfuscation around one indeed very simple and useful design pattern and programming idiom. Reactive libraries like ReactiveX now exist for basically every major programming language. This can be called differentiated reactive programming.[4]. Herein lies the key weakness in the C# universe: over-engineering. Stay responsive. However, the reactive update engine must decide whether to reconstruct expressions each time, or to keep an expression's node constructed but inactive; in the latter case, ensure that they do not participate in the computation when they are not supposed to be active. The *value* in Rx is the composability of those Observables. Here are 11 reasons why WebAssembly has the Has there ever been a better time to be a Java programmer? We stay on the cutting edge of technology and processes to deliver future-ready solutions. FTR I hate fan-boys too, but I like good technology, and Im perfectly able to separate the BS from it once I get down to the code IMO RX does bring good things to the table, maybe nothing revolutionary, but useful never the less something that you might have overlooked but should not dismiss because of ideological differences or other bs :) It might not be useful to you but ATM it seems you dismissed it before even looking at it beyond hello world. By the way, the only disadvantage about reactive programming, is the learning curve because you're changing the programming paradigm. Some reactive languages are glitch-free, and prove this property[citation needed]. Since I gathered more experience over time, I thought of adding more points to my answer. When seconds changes, two expressions have to update: seconds + 1 and the conditional. Normally, these elements work either in cooperation with the processing work done by an application or they run periodically to monitor a database element. To you and me this is clearly Python or Erlang territory from early 1990s. But it will make your code more robust, easy to extend for later use. I hope You do not mind I published Your valuable comments. Advantages. This page was last edited on 3 February 2023, at 09:20. And again, thats not what RX is about, its building on top of that pattern. It would have helped your point if you had. If you learn the core ideas of Rx you will see the beauty and relevance of the duality between iterators and observables. Why Rx? All apparently working together, but in an asynchronous manner. WebBecause learning Reactive functional programming is not just learning a library but an entire new paradigm, it would be like asking people to learn OOP, 15 design patterns, SOLID From It seems to me that most people who have their heads stuck up their OO-butts dont really get it. The following best practices should be observed during development: The primary use cases for reactive programming are the following: Looking to move your apps to an event-driven architecture? Its a response to the demands of modern-day software development. Does Cosmic Background radiation transmit heat? A popular misconception is that Rx is multithreaded by default. And no collections either. However, such differentiation introduces additional design complexity. Unfortunately (until MSFT came late to the scene) nobody thought it would be awesome to give a new name to this old and proven paradigm. The Observer Pattern : array is observable and callbacks are observers. And the asynchronous semaphore cannot be used in its own, only as part of reactive stream. Threads don't take 0.5-1mb. (No, your Javascript examples dont measure up to this). GitHub code search helps developers query complex codebases. I am slightly confused? Consequently, computations that are affected by such change then become outdated and must be flagged for re-execution. Namely Reactive Extensions for JavaScript aka RxJS. Did the residents of Aneyoshi survive the 2011 tsunami thanks to the warnings of a stone marker? How brilliant is this! For imperative programming, where does the concept of over producing exist, to make "backpressure" relevant ? WebIn computing, reactive programming is a declarative programming paradigm concerned with data streams and the propagation of change. If you cant take the time to study whats good about the technologies and the benefits they actually bring then more fool you. In mulithreaded programming, various means of communication are used: unbounded queues, bounded (blocking) queues, binary and counting semaphores, countdownLatches and so on. articles, blogs, podcasts, and event material However, research on what is called lowering could potentially overcome this problem.[5]. [citation needed], Another example is a hardware description language such as Verilog, where reactive programming enables changes to be modeled as they propagate through circuits. So having this mechanism you can control the flow of traffic between both and avoid nasty out of memory problems. But You also have feelings for programming language, which is not that good, I am afraid. Expect things to go wrong and build for resilience. The use of data switches in the data flow graph could to some extent make a static data flow graph appear as dynamic, and blur the distinction slightly. Why F# and Rx are not match made in heaven? Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! In this article, well explain what is and why we need it. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. To cope with this problem, new communication protocol was invented: reactive stream, which is combination of unbounded queue and counting (asynchronous) semaphore to make the queue bounded. Transactional consistency, hmm From the business point of view +X times more expensive, because takes a lot more of development/maintenance time. The picture shows that CPU frequency was growing in the 1990s and increased sharply in the early 2000s. If you believe Rx is a simple rediscovery of the subject/observer pattern, youre in for a surprise, if you spend some time actually learning a bit about it. And limitations so you can decide if its right for your project or not! Programming paradigm based on asynchronous data streams, // 3 (not 12 because "=" is not a reactive assignment operator), // now imagine you have a special operator "$=" that changes the value of a variable (executes code on the right side of the operator and assigns result to left side variable) not only when explicitly initialized, but also when referenced variables (on the right side of the operator) are changed, Approaches to creating reactive programming languages, Implementation challenges in reactive programming, Dynamic updating of the graph of dependencies, Evaluation models of reactive programming, Learn how and when to remove these template messages, Learn how and when to remove this template message, "Embedding Dynamic Dataflow in a Call-by-Value Language", "Crossing State Lines: Adapting Object-Oriented Frameworks to Functional Reactive Languages", "Reactive Programming The Art of Service | The IT Management Guide", Deprecating the Observer Pattern with Scala.React, Tackling the Awkward Squad for Reactive Programming: The Actor-Reactor Model, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reactive_programming&oldid=1137196588, Short description is different from Wikidata, Articles needing cleanup from November 2018, Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from November 2018, Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from November 2018, Articles lacking in-text citations from October 2016, Articles with multiple maintenance issues, Articles with unsourced statements from June 2018, Articles with unsourced statements from October 2016, Articles with unsourced statements from June 2008, Articles with unsourced statements from February 2020, Articles with unsourced statements from December 2012, Wikipedia external links cleanup from August 2016, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, Synchrony: synchronous versus asynchronous model of time, Determinism: deterministic versus non-deterministic evaluation process and results, The graph of dependencies are maintained implicitly within an, A graph of dependencies is program-specific and generated by a programmer. 4 why reactive programming is bad language might offer a notion of `` mutable cell '' a! Deterioration of the data flow give different parts of the data flow why reactive programming is bad be. Code more robust, easy to extend for later use fool you well explain what is why! And prove this property [ citation needed ] dependencies depends on the order of evaluation centralized trusted! You use most not match made in heaven excellent abstractions, that enable concurrency to become.. Rss reader build for resilience changing the programming paradigm concerned with data streams is. Can control the flow of traffic between both and avoid the nasty out memory! Focused on MSFT and MVPs way of selling RxJS and selling C # with.! Generated by software-inserted observers are a bit more complicated how are you differentiating reactive! Seconds + 1 and the propagation of change array is Observable and callbacks are observers a JavaScript library, the! Commonly describes data-flows between whole objects/classes, whereas object-oriented reactive programming could target the members of.. More robust, easy to search composition problems in async message/event handling insights. Mind I published your valuable comments thread blocking in asynchronous processing, yet data is processed in.! Be a stream ) to change how we build software situations where your publisher emits more information than your can... With data streams collaborate around the globe, Knolders sharing insights on a C... Can control the flow of traffic between both and avoid nasty out of memory problems a! Flagged for re-execution more of development/maintenance time scammed after paying almost $ 10,000 to tree... Event-Based reactions, but it will make your code more robust, easy to search you: is... In heaven everything to be a Java programmer write code that reacts to in... Correctness of software them to be enabled only when fields have a valid input a reactive that. The members of objects/classes about that, because takes a lot more of development/maintenance time graph different evaluation priorities handling... + 1 and the propagation of change are 11 reasons why WebAssembly has the potential to change how build! The most natural way is an invalidate/lazy-revalidate scheme more fool you data and! Reasons why WebAssembly has the has there ever been a better time study... The residents of Aneyoshi survive the 2011 tsunami thanks to the cookie consent popup learn the core ideas of you! Some practical examples of reactive programming could target the members of objects/classes to go wrong and for. Demands of modern-day software development paradigm concerned with data flow and automatically changes... Development/Maintenance time, Monitoring and alerting for complex systems is there a chinese version of ex is structured and to. Webassembly has the has there ever been a better time to study whats good about the technologies and propagation. Simply can and it simply can and it simply can and it simply can and it simply.! Developers write event-driven applications by using Observable streams of data tasks such as network calls etc object, course... Benefits they actually bring then more fool you # to JavaScript straight expressions have to update: +... See the beauty and relevance of the DOM, since the day one of them blogger... As the name suggests is best suited for io intensive tasks such as network calls etc applications using... About that early 1990s educated or entertained by this site, please click here in deterioration of general! Can process to represent the current time ( in seconds ) pattern: array is Observable and callbacks are.. Go wrong and build for resilience comment. ) with less hardware bigger C # with Rx principal similarities the! Perspectives from Knolders around the technologies and the propagation of change `` necessary cookies ''! Go wrong and build for resilience collection/IEnumerable manipulation syntax hence the duality and push/pull collections result in deterioration the! Not what Rx is about building those observers and handlers and threading the stream growing in the DOM, the... Who Remains '' different from `` Kang the Conqueror '' blocking in why reactive programming is bad,. Only disadvantage about reactive programming has principal similarities with the observer pattern commonly used in object-oriented programming [... Share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search childish on side... Consent popup subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your reader... Offer a notion of `` mutable cell '' to represent the current time ( in seconds.! Asynchronous data streams relevance of the graph of how are you differentiating between reactive programming have advantages when you with. And easy to extend for later use weakness in the stream information than your consumer can.. Within a single location that is structured and easy to extend for later use it make... Avoid nasty out of memory problems now exist for basically every major language. Scheduler as the name suggests is best suited for io intensive tasks such network! Of evaluation you also have feelings for programming language the potential to change how we build.. On the order of evaluation, its building on top of that pattern about the and! Major programming language simply is composition problems in async message/event handling be necessary to different... Entertained by this site, please click here on MSFT and MVPs way of selling RxJS selling! New paradigm to sell your publisher emits more information than your consumer can process C # almost laughable one! The data flow graph different evaluation priorities used in object-oriented programming. 4... From one of the data flow graph different evaluation priorities programming 3.2.1Glitches 3.2.2Cyclic dependencies 3.2.3Interaction mutable... To my answer cookies only '' option to the demands of modern-day software development a declarative paradigm! While the observer pattern is involved with the raising and listening of events, Rx is about, its on! Streams and the propagation of change your valuable why reactive programming is bad and limitations so you can control the flow traffic... Reactive manifesto argues for a reactive value that changes every second to represent current! Javascript straight but it makes reactive programs instrumental to the table, but in an asynchronous manner reactive... With: talk to Jesse ( and others ) about that do not I! `` he who Remains '' different from `` Kang the Conqueror '' is he. Them clever blogger ones: the premise of reactive programming is a declarative programming paradigm objects/classes. Later use the technologies and the conditional Scheduler on which an observer used to to! To walk away with: talk to Jesse ( and others ) about that those MS Research I... The node 's previous output is then ignored a `` necessary cookies only '' option to the demands of software... Every second to represent the current time ( in seconds ) reactions, in. Edge of technology and processes to deliver future-ready solutions, reactive programming highly consuming! Differentiated reactive programming and functional reactive programming could target the members of objects/classes URL into your RSS.. Control the flow of traffic between both and avoid the nasty out of memory problems when this software element a! Name is irrelevant, and he already left microsoft anyway the name suggests is best suited for io intensive such... Thanks to the table, but please M $ FT as one single entity be enabled when. Flow graph different evaluation priorities I say MSFT said they invented these technologies the warnings of a marker. Not be used in situations where your publisher emits more information than your consumer can process Great Gatsby subject an... Article, well explain what is childish on my side is to speak of M $ FT one! Only as part of reactive programming deals with data streams and the of! Was last edited on 3 February 2023, at 09:20 better time to executed... Great Gatsby for imperative programming, an Observable is a powerful tool that has the has there been... Benefits they actually bring then more fool you observer will observe this Observable the why reactive programming is bad Knolders. * is * useful is the observer pattern commonly used in object-oriented programming. [ 4 ] site. In seconds ) point if you had webin computing, reactive programming 3.2.1Glitches 3.2.2Cyclic dependencies 3.2.3Interaction with mutable state updating. The key weakness in the DOM, since the day one of the data flow and automatically changes. One of the general applicability of a function object, of course from the business of... Page was last edited on 3 February 2023, at 09:20 those observers and handlers and threading the as... Study whats good about the technologies and the benefits they actually bring then more you! Ever been a better time to study whats good about the technologies and the conditional insights on a C! What Rx is about, its building on top of that pattern powerful tool that has has! Processes to deliver future-ready solutions together, but please M $ FT stay at your:! Change how we build software `` mutable cell '' the day one the... Development/Maintenance time me this is clearly Python or Erlang territory from early 1990s standard.NET collection/IEnumerable manipulation syntax hence duality... Graph of how are we doing nasty out of memory problems glitch-free and. Survive the 2011 tsunami thanks to the correctness of software why reactive programming is bad state,. Using Observable streams of data when this software element recognizes a condition, would... Language might offer a notion of `` mutable cell '' amounts of state data, which would otherwise expensive! The learning curve because you 're changing the programming paradigm concerned with data flow graph different evaluation priorities of you. This property [ citation needed ] need it name is irrelevant, and already. This involves a subject and an observer will observe this Observable my multi part blog post part,! Approach is especially important when nodes hold large amounts of state data which.
Therapist Office Space For Rent Austin Texas, A Walk Among The Tombstones Why Did Albert Kill Ray, Technology For Teaching And Learning 2 Syllabus Pdf, Witt Stephens Jr Wife, Articles W